From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 13:55:27 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3F37B401 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (A17-250-248-86.apple.com [17.250.248.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6419543FAF for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rolnif@mac.com) Received: from asmtp02.mac.com (asmtp02-qfe3 [10.13.10.66]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h36KtQ0x016996 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.com ([66.92.1.188]) by asmtp02.mac.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id HCXWSD00.K47 for ; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:55:25 -0700 Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 13:55:24 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551) From: John Martinez To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <000401c2fc75$578b37f0$c601a8c0@plasma> Message-Id: <16586B0C-6872-11D7-B7DE-0003937C0B34@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551) Subject: Re: Brilliant and very useful for FreeBSD, IMHO X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 20:55:27 -0000 On Sunday, April 6, 2003, at 12:47 PM, Peter wrote: > Never said anything about changing the GUI, but it does need some > work, its > hard for normal users to get with it, but I never want to see it > become some > kind of X11 GUI, I can pretty much go through /stand/sysinstall in my > sleep, > and thats how I want it to stay. I tend to agree with this. The problem is that you are limited by the same GUI environments as Linux and every other UNIX operating system. Not that KDE is bad (I use it a lot still), but a FreeBSD desktop would need something to make it "unique" and more appealing to the normal user. Lots of eye candy. Or else, why would somebody choose DesktopBSD over one of the many desktop Linux distributions? I prefer BSD myself, and that's one of the reasons I went with a Mac with OS X. -john