From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Sep 21 2:20:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from ctlmailgw.comptel.com (ctlmailgw.comptel.com [192.102.20.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1159E152EA; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 02:20:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stefan.parvu@comptel.com) Received: from miina.comptel.com (unverified [194.240.21.9]) by ctlmailgw.comptel.com (Data Fellows SMTPRS 2.04) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:14:00 +0300 Received: from comptel.com (xf174.comptel.com [195.237.135.174]) by miina.comptel.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.7.1) id MAA16978; Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:20:12 +0300 (EETDST) Message-Id: <37E74D86.B7B97BAE@comptel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 1999 12:19:02 +0300 From: stefan parvu X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 on 3.2 STABLE ? References: <37E73063.8AD59A0D@comptel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well and more details from mailing list is that there is no "standard" for IPv6 yet. Somebody could explain a little bit here what really means this when DEC, HP they have already on the TCP stack the newest IP ? Stef stefan parvu wrote: > > Hello, > > Last night I worked to port some code to FreeBSD 3.2 Stable. > I was curious about one fact: on there is no any in6_addr > support for IPv6. Am I wrong ? FreeBSD does not support IPv6 ? > > Regards, > Stef > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message