From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 26 21:17:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E6016B380; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E4043D8C; Fri, 26 May 2006 21:16:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (0x50a07cfc.naenxx7.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.160.124.252]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50D8FAC014; Fri, 26 May 2006 23:16:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k4QLGlDC011535; Fri, 26 May 2006 23:16:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Alexander Leidinger From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 May 2006 20:44:57 +0200." <20060526204457.3e545e4f@Magellan.Leidinger.net> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 23:16:46 +0200 Message-ID: <11534.1148678206@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/doc/subsys Dependencies Doxyfile-cam Doxyfile-crypto Doxyfile-dev_pci Doxyfile-dev_sound Doxyfile-dev_usb Doxyfile-geom Doxyfile-i4b Doxyfile-kern Doxyfile-libkern Doxyfile-linux Doxyfile-net80211 ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 21:17:28 -0000 In message <20060526204457.3e545e4f@Magellan.Leidinger.net>, Alexander Leidinger writes: >Quoting "Poul-Henning Kamp" (Fri, 26 May 2006 20:20:36 +0200): > >> In message <200605261806.k4QI67D3007680@repoman.freebsd.org>, Alexander Leiding >> er writes: >> >> > This is the kernel subsystem API documentation generation framework. >> > >> > It uses doxygen to generate the API documentation. For each subsystem >> > a very small (about 20 lines with comments) subsystem specific Doxyfile >> > has to be written (have a look at the README for more). All common doxygen >> > options are specified in a separate file. >> >> Now, this is all well and good, but the most critical question in >> my mind is: how do we prevent (or alternatively: mark up) documentation >> for functions which are not supposed to be public ? > >http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/commands.html#cmdinternal Can we agree that no functions will be put into publicized documentation until somebody has considered if the function actually is a public function or not ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.