Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:43:14 +0200 (MET DST) From: Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> To: swhetzel@gmail.com (Scot Hetzel) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org Subject: Re: "the best" port update tool Message-ID: <200608231543.RAA25312@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0608230739v36143292k68852b1677f1d7f4@mail.gmail.com> from Scot Hetzel at "Aug 23, 2006 9:39:47 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scot Hetzel:
>On 8/23/06, Helge Oldach <helge.oldach@atosorigin.com> wrote:
>> .if ${.CURDIR:M*/mail/fetchmail}
>> .MAKEFLAGS: -DWITH_NTLM
>> .endif
>>
>> Note specifically the ".MAKEFLAGS" trick above that IMHO won't easily
>> work with portconf.
>>
>That will work with portconf, without using .MAKEFLAGS:
>
>mail/fetchmail: WITH_NTLM
>
>You could have also used "WITH_NTLM=YES" instead of .MAKEFLAGS in your
>make.conf
Indeed true nowadays. However I'm pretty sure a couple of months ago
"WITH_NTLM=YES" and ".MAKEFLAGS=-DWITH_NTLM" weren't identical, and
"WITH_NTLM=YES" just wouldn't make it (verbatim :-)). I'm not sure what
the reason was. I suspect a change to the fetchmail port's Makefile, or
to bsd.port.mk. There was a reason why I had to do it this way. Anyway,
history.
Helge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200608231543.RAA25312>