Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 27 Nov 2010 23:34:37 +0100 (CET)
From:      Stefan `Sec` Zehl <sec@42.org>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   ports/152624: arpwatch "ethercodes.dat" is outdated
Message-ID:  <20101127223437.E918628416@ice.42.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <201011272240.oARMeCJP070184@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         152624
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       arpwatch "ethercodes.dat" is outdated
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Nov 27 22:40:11 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Stefan `Sec` Zehl
>Release:        FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD ice 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #15: Mon Oct 25 12:20:38 CEST 2010 root@ice:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ICE amd64


	
>Description:

Arpwatch consults an "ethercodes.dat" file to identify Hardware vendors.
The file contained in the arpwatch distribution is from 2006 and thus 
outdated and misses many vendors.

It would be better if the arpwatch port could install a more current file.

	
>How-To-Repeat:
	
>Fix:

The arpwatch distribution contains a script "massagevendor" which converts
the official list from http://standards.ieee.org/regauth/oui/oui.txt
into the correct format.

I'm not sure how this should be handled best. Either the port could simply
fetch and install the file during portinstall time, or an updated file
could simply be "shipped" in files/ as part of the port.

	


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101127223437.E918628416>