From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 6 19:25:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E21106568F for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trasz@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from pin.if.uz.zgora.pl (pin.if.uz.zgora.pl [212.109.128.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 486DB8FC08 for ; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 19:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trasz@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: by pin.if.uz.zgora.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E60B039BCB; Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:28:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 20:28:29 +0100 From: Edward Tomasz Napierala To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20081106192829.GA98742@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> References: <20081027193545.GA95872@pin.if.uz.zgora.pl> <20081028161855.GA45129@zim.MIT.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081028161855.GA45129@zim.MIT.EDU> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Subject: Re: Directory rename semantics. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 19:25:40 -0000 After discussion about this with rwatson and pjd, I decided to do the opposite: change ZFS behaviour to match UFS. Reason is simple: this is security, and we want to be conservative here. It's impossible to make sure this change wouldn't cause security problems. -- If you cut off my head, what would I say? Me and my head, or me and my body?