From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 13 10:51:37 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA10325 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:51:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from shell.firehouse.net (brian@shell.firehouse.net [209.42.203.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA10320 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 10:51:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@shell.firehouse.net) Received: from localhost (brian@localhost) by shell.firehouse.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id NAA23352; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 13:51:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 13:51:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Mitchell To: Thomas David Rivers cc: dcarmich@mcs.com, Shimon@i-Connect.Net, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <199710131307.JAA01460@lakes.dignus.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > Simon Shapiro writes:> > > > > Hi Douglas Carmichael; On 13-Oct-97 you wrote: > > > Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards > > > FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a > > > network)? > > > > Last I checked (looooong time ago), Unix had the same problem. TCP/IP was, > > at the time, inhenerntly un-Orangable. > > > > Hmmm.. Data General has a variant of DG/UX which is at least B1 (if not > C2...) Does anyone know the details there? Perhaps I can dig up some > old contacts and find out what they did with this issue. > > - Dave Rivers - > > Do they? Last I checked, it had not been out of evaluation yet. Has this changed? It wasnt on the NSA page as of a few weeks ago.