From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Feb 18 1:53: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mail.mclink.it (net128-007.mclink.it [195.110.128.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7691E37B401 for ; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 01:52:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mclink.it (net156-075.mclink.it [195.110.156.75]) by mail.mclink.it (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1I9qje09392; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:52:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <3A8F9B5B.8BE3C6FE@mclink.it> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 10:52:27 +0100 From: Marco Masotti Reply-To: masotti@mclink.it X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kstewart@urx.com Cc: Russell Francis , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xcpustate and SMP References: <3A8F2860.A8CC571C@urx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kent, my SMP config is actually a kernel SMP config. I believe Russel has got the right point when saying that something is missing inside to admire the SMP at work. Actually again, the SMP behaves quite right, the system appears quite fine grained to allow most identical programs, when run in parallel, to run maxing all the available cpus all their way out. That even if the specific applications are not designed to accomodate their threads avoiding to step onto each other foot while executing. I'm satisified with FreeBSD smp as I can be with linux, apparently as far as I've seen till now. Yet, the problem is in xcpustate, and also possibly in xosview (not tried that yet). Thank you for all replies. Regards all --- Marco Kent Stewart wrote: > Russell Francis wrote: > > > > > > > Marco Masotti wrote: > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I' running xcpustate on a bi-processor machine, but I'm not able to see > > > > the two bars that would be involved in a SMP config. > > > > > > > > When running locally on supported multiprocessors > > > > (SolbourneOS/MPsystems, Ultrix multiprocessors, Linux/SMP, and the > > > > Gould NP1), there will be one bar for each CPU. > > > > > > > > My hardware is an Abit BP6 with 2xCeleron@550, FreeBSD 4._REL, xcpustate > > > > is version 2.5, patchlevel 1.13 > > > > > > > > BTW, Is FreeBSD a *not supported* multiprocessor? > > > > > > It is unless you turn on multi-processor support in the kernel. > > > > > > Kent > > > > I am also running a dual system and even with SMP compiled into the > > kernel, the issue with monitoring software (xcpustate, xosview) only > > showing one CPU still exists. SMP is supported though because when > > one processor is maxed out it will show 50% when both processors are > > maxed it will show 100%. SMP works but the software to admire it isn't > > quite there. > > That is too bad. I just got a Abit VP8 with dual 866 running and so > far my AMD Thunderbird 900 will do buildworld's 20% faster. I was > hoping there was something that would show me where the bottleneck > was. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message