From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 02:27:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903D5106566B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:27:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gloomweaver.pittgoth.com (gloomweaver.pittgoth.com [205.134.165.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56ADD8FC13; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost.fbsdsecure.org (net-ix.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by gloomweaver.pittgoth.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8O2FIPT097931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:15:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:14:08 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: Rink Springer Message-Id: <20090923221408.5c9af2c1.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090923181812.GA14098@rink.nu> References: <200909230906.n8N96KZU004384@lurza.secnetix.de> <4AB9E9F0.3020500@elischer.org> <51C55D74-F18B-4356-811E-13B4AA938D48@80386.nl> <4ABA5965.4090802@elischer.org> <20090923173801.GI95398@hoeg.nl> <20090923181812.GA14098@rink.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ed@80386.nl, olli@lurza.secnetix.de, julian@elischer.org, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:27:18 -0000 On Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:18:12 +0200 Rink Springer wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > I still miss pcvt(4). > > Not a day passes without me missing Alpha.. [*] > > [*] This is not serious, but it should illustrate the point: no one > stepped up, and appearantly no one bothered to try window(1) but > suddenly it's terrible that it was nuked months ago... > > Bottomline: can we PLEASE drop this thread and get to coding? Or in > terms people likely will understand more, 'kill -SIGSTOP $thread'. IIRC, there was a thread on window(1). I'd need to look in my archives to find it, but what I do recall is that only one person stood up and complained AFTER I had removed it. People can put it back if they'd like, and I won't care. :) -- Tom Rhodes