From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 5 07:24:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA20A37B401 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:24:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from netgecko.info (netgecko.info [217.160.92.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A3343F85 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:24:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alex.kiesel@document-root.de) Received: from [192.168.1.31] (p508B2C7E.dip.t-dialin.net [80.139.44.126]) by netgecko.info (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D84488003 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:25:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Alex Kiesel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20030401141621.F8EA.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> References: <20030401141621.F8EA.JOEL@alpsgiken.gr.jp> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1049556287.25007.4.camel@detention.home.ahk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 Date: 05 Apr 2003 17:24:47 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: php, mod_php unifiable? Pear? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 15:24:51 -0000 On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 07:47, Joel Rees wrote: > First question: Does everyone keep mod_php4 and php4 as separate ports, > even when using both. I'm assuming, since the php.standalone (or > whatever it was) is there and contains it's own php.ini, that is the > case. > > Does anyone try to keep them together? You are more or less forced to, because those two ports have been merged together since the last major update. There have been discussions about this on ports@. Greets, Alex