Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 12:08:29 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Gore Jarold <gore_jarold@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dangers of delaying an fsck on busy fileserver ? Message-ID: <20070519090828.GO41395@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <550589.3257.qm@web63006.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <550589.3257.qm@web63006.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KIbT1ud6duwZIwNL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 10:58:26PM -0700, Gore Jarold wrote: > I have a busy fileserver - 5-20 sftp/rsync processes > running on it at all times. >=20 > For unknown reasons, this server crashes in the middle > of the night sometimes. When it does, I comment out What exactly you mean by crashing ? There is one pending MFC that shall cure a deadlock/panic scenario for busy fs being snapshotted. It awaits re@ approval. Also, there is a situation where exceeding inode quota on softupdate fs could cause snapshotting to deadlock (fix is in progress). --KIbT1ud6duwZIwNL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGTr6MC3+MBN1Mb4gRAtM+AJwNNRDArSktDBf943FbyzVFLNpCBwCaAv8a ETwYiBQuIpFMjs+q9PYQlUY= =9Xo4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KIbT1ud6duwZIwNL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070519090828.GO41395>