From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 2 21:34:03 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id VAA00135 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 21:34:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from dumbo.hh.kew.com (root@dumbo.hh.kew.com [192.195.203.133]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id VAA29999 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 1997 21:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from sonata (sonata.hh.kew.com [192.195.203.135]) by dumbo.hh.kew.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA10207; Fri, 3 Jan 1997 00:33:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <32CC9A18.566@kew.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 00:33:12 -0500 From: Drew Derbyshire Organization: Kendra Electronic Wonderworks X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0 (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu CC: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kerberos on FreeBSD 2.1.6 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jan 1997, Drew Derbyshire wrote: > > Is it an error that Kerberos is enabled by default on FreeBSd 2.1.6 > > binaries by default, since the "make world" on the source does NOT > > appear to include this support? I'm getting warnings from numerous > > applications, including 'su' and 'rsh'; the latter is especially > > annoying. > > I don't know from a stock build, but the system doesn't come wired for > kerberos unless you install the kerberos distribution. Hmmm. I didn't expect it to be so 'actively' wired for it if I included that distribution. No doubt that's what I did. I did a make world and the messages cleared. -- Internet: ahd@kew.com Voice: 617-279-9810 MASOCHIST: Windows SDK programmer with a smile!