Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:37:39 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: pav@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@sigpipe.cz> Subject: Re: Unifying WWW: pkg-descr lines for cpan ports Message-ID: <4326C813.9040202@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1126614807.54365.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> References: <200509102222.j8AMMubj032724@bright.research.att.com> <4326A53C.5020808@FreeBSD.org> <1126609121.54365.17.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B439.4090308@FreeBSD.org> <1126610216.54365.20.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <4326B5CF.1070606@FreeBSD.org> <1126610573.54365.23.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> <20050913122601.GG563@isis.sigpipe.cz> <1126614807.54365.28.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pav Lucistnik wrote: >> I beg to disagree. I wouldn't be looking for it there. A 3.2.1.1 >> would be better. > > > I don't want to clutter Quick Porting section with such specialized > info. It's supposed to give you a really quick start to your first port. You right. 6.4 section is 'Using perl' and question we discuss is for it. > > We can debate if the structuring of PH into Quick Porting and Slow > Porting, duplicating much of the data of first in the second, is a good > design. It's a great design. I still remember I read it for a first time. > > It could be a "Note:". > Agree. -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4326C813.9040202>