From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 22 21:51:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E67F106564A; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BBC8FC17; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AD9F46B06; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:51:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from jhbbsd.hudson-trading.com (unknown [209.249.190.8]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 20C698A01A; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:51:30 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: arch@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:51:23 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200904221751.23535.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:51:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.95 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=4.2 tests=AWL,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: jkoshy@FreeBSD.org Subject: Removing the perfmon(4) driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:51:31 -0000 While looking at something else today I noticed that we have a perfmon(4) driver which is an old driver that provided early support for the performance counters on the Pentium and Pentium Pro. At this point it seems to be superseded by hwpmc(4). Are there any objections to removing perform(4)? -- John Baldwin