From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Jan 31 12:21:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from rigel.grass.st (rigel.grass.st [195.197.32.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6F537B65D for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:21:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from bsdisp@localhost) by rigel.grass.st (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA48345; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:21:29 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from bsdisp) Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:21:29 +0200 From: mika ruohotie To: Ignacio Cristerna Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: web caching Message-ID: <20010131222129.A47974@rigel.grass.st> References: <20010124144057.A83508@rigel.grass.st> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from ignacioc@avantel.net on Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:59:54PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 12:59:54PM -0600, Ignacio Cristerna wrote: > I am about to start using a Web chache. Is there a special reason why you´re > looking for a Squid replacement? Is there any shortcomings in using Squid? yes, squid requires too much attention, since it keeps dying itself every now and then. we're looking for something much more professional solution, at least when it comes in stability. also, i've been runnign squid, multiple versions, for several years now, and it's still "not quite there yet" when it comes to keep its disks sane. tho 2.3-rel4 is tolerable with that. yet, it still seems to die too often. mickey -- mika ruohotie, jippii group To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message