From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Oct 30 9: 2:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50BEA37B479 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 09:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA14152; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:02:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.9.1) id e9UH2gt25639; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:02:42 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 12:02:42 -0500 (EST) To: Ralph Schreyer Cc: freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, Jan Conrad Subject: Re: Compiled kernel does not work In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14845.43335.266346.125079@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ralph Schreyer writes: > Hello Drew, > > so what would you suggest us to do with the confused sources? Wait for 4.2 > release or just take the sources of 4.1.1 release as they are and fix the > problems with the *.hints files by hand as we did it. Are more of the > sources in 4.1.1 release actually from current or just the ones we > stumbled over? > > best regards, > > Ralph. > I really have no idea how you got the problatic -current sources in the first place. I don't know if it was a problem with the distribution or if it was a problem with the mirror where you got them, or if it was some sort of typo on your part.. I'd suggest cvsupp'ing to -stable and running that. Or waiting for 4.2-release. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message