From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Nov 21 20:12:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA25974 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:12:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from root.com (root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA25969 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:12:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@root.com) Received: from root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA01794; Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:12:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199811220412.UAA01794@root.com> To: Shawn Ramsey cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf's In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Nov 1998 00:22:53 PST." <19981121002253.G7077@cpl.net> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1998 20:12:46 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >Is this normal? Right after bootup : > >72 mbufs in use: > 66 mbufs allocated to data > 1 mbufs allocated to packet headers > 4 mbufs allocated to protocol control blocks > 1 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses >64/66 mbuf clusters in use >141 Kbytes allocated to network (97% in use) >0 requests for memory denied >0 requests for memory delayed >0 calls to protocol drain routines > > > >This machine used to stay around 10% most of the time...(before I recompiled >the kernel) is there a kernel option to increase the mbufs and mbuf clusters? The % number is a percentage of the peak, not of the maximum. It is confusing and probably shouldn't be reported. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message