From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 22 01:28:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9711065670 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 01:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0506.google.com (rv-out-0506.google.com [209.85.198.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89B108FC19 for ; Thu, 22 May 2008 01:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id b25so3137720rvf.43 for ; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:28:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=H6Azea4B/ilcbvdMlxUUykgxFanGVxFAu2af+n2a/bc=; b=Lc2PvpJY9b8rq2NTvSl7VrcIEHRlyuw6aODU06jYuFukTR7X1W/aiSQhERge1Tjvka4qDqk/X6T590EFfUHrOeQUUE/JtMeDslZjiCK6jl/TuObEeJpiFZOaHMcZay4a8k8egPfURU3K+5QxgkrPkT7jdWkf5qpjtpY7Oehm+2Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=iVg2zI/BlRtiszezbUzYqD5LXDk2yRHflK6qBhGs5qOJ8u80RszFlg1ngWxnPG3cIPBJzovgKPV/JCXF72rDKRzKTJCak3DllmIuw6vOrbJq7v+Lf8Vn7FVjLnlliNqS2bqZP9JWEA9HOMfxEaMeX7JUi7JLtpw5rr7S1PcNQUc= Received: by 10.141.49.6 with SMTP id b6mr5511120rvk.89.1211419733081; Wed, 21 May 2008 18:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm3228826rvb.4.2008.05.21.18.28.50 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 May 2008 18:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m4M1SkC3037720 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 22 May 2008 10:28:46 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id m4M1Sk4C037719; Thu, 22 May 2008 10:28:46 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 10:28:46 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: Norikatsu Shigemura Message-ID: <20080522012846.GB37422@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20080517231220.c64a992b.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080519071459.GA26209@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080519100523.GB26209@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080520025052.0efd7cd5.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20080520001312.GA29721@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20080522102032.45f11aa2.nork@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080522102032.45f11aa2.nork@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Cardbus GbE (Realtek 8169SBL) supported? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 01:28:53 -0000 On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:20:32AM +0900, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > Hi Pyun. > > On Tue, 20 May 2008 09:13:12 +0900 > Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > re0: Chip rev. 0x10000000 > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Hmm, this looks very weird. This revision indicates the hardware is > > 8169SB/8110SB. The chip revision of your first mail was 0x7cc00000. > > Hum.... > > > > Please wait a while until next report:-). > > Ok, let me know how it goes. > > There are some problems on PHY operations like following: > > 1. doesn't manual link up, offten. > # ifconfig re0 up > re0: PHY write failed > re0: PHY write failed > re0: PHY write failed > re0: PHY write failed > # > (But 'status: no carrier' or no 'status:' line) > > 2. doesn't automatic link up on connected to L2SW, sometimes. > # ifconfig re0 > : > staus: no carrier > > Sometimes, good works. Such as, RTL8169SBL communicated good. > Overall, it is not stable. Would you show me the output of "devinfo -v | grep oui"? -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon