From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 01:24:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A4C16A473 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BD813C461 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F297163F82 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:51:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B1FD0501 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:50:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:50:11 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 -0000 On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > > ... I have for some time wanted to add support > to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install > sensible defaults for rc.conf, What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults in the rc.d script, which is generally what happens now for scripts installed by ports. It would allow a port to install variant defaults, but that sounds very confusing.