Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 16:36:58 -0500 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: freeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Does bind Have So Many Dependencies Message-ID: <c26dc744-7740-40a2-a0ad-329339a4766d@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <af6d7f7c-7c44-4f68-ae40-419efb9873c3@app.fastmail.com> References: <d3eb7a53-666d-4885-9c28-46750d915041@tundraware.com> <44bk7ff70i.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <18e4819d3e0.2890.0b331fcf0b21179f1640bd439e3f4a1e@tundraware.com> <af6d7f7c-7c44-4f68-ae40-419efb9873c3@app.fastmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/16/24 15:54, robert@rrbrussell.com wrote: . > > To rebuild the manpages and other documentation from source requires groff and a few other tools. Portmaster can uninstall build dependencies that aren’t in the run dependencies list after installation of the port. ```pkg autoremove``` will also remove unneeded build dependencies. The last option is using poudrière. ```pkg install``` will only pull in the needed runtime dependencies. > > I am assuming don’t want to use the default package repository. Yes, I've deleted the offending unneeded dependencies with "pgk autoremove". I think my central question is really why the port installation even attempts to install these if I indicate that I do not want docs in the initial config menu.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c26dc744-7740-40a2-a0ad-329339a4766d>