From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 23 20:28:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BEA016A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:28:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se (limicola.its.UU.SE [130.238.7.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E993B43D3F for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:28:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ante@Update.UU.SE) Received: by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205) id AB50F4955; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:28:23 +0100 (MEZ) Received: from limicola.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by limicola.its.uu.se via virus-scan id s32783; Wed, 23 Mar 05 21:28:20 +0100 Received: from Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.25]) by limicola.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C148484F; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:28:20 +0100 (MEZ) Received: by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix, from userid 30086) id 61AC538012; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:28:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Psilocybe.Update.UU.SE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604105C002; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:28:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 21:28:20 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Davour To: Marco Beishuizen In-Reply-To: <20050323202358.C715@yokozuna.lan> Message-ID: References: <20050323202358.C715@yokozuna.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Acroread7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:28:26 -0000 On Wed, 23 Mar 2005, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On stardate Wed, 23 Mar 2005, the wise Andreas Davour entered: > >> Exactly the same. >> >> As Erik (et al) wrote, it will all be pulled in and resolved as >> dependencies if you have a sufficienyly up-to-date ports tree. >> >> Kind of annyoing that it wasn't caught before it was comitted at all, but >> considering the total confusion that reigns right now with two different >> acroread ports it's just what can be expected. >> >> I did a cvsup 30 minutes ago, and then it worked. >> >> /Andreas > > Hmm I also did a cvsup, but it makes no difference, I still get the sam > error. I guess I have an other problem on my system. You'll have to pkg_delete the old acroread port, and I did a "make clean" as well. Try that, and it might work. /Andreas -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?