From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sat May 11 16:40:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4943C15A18F0; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 858B28F08C; Sat, 11 May 2019 16:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id x4BGeYAk032642; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id x4BGeYk0032641; Sat, 11 May 2019 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201905111640.x4BGeYk0032641@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r347477 - head/sys/kern In-Reply-To: <4dbd3d4b-3d6c-d0b0-e6a7-8c80997124dd@FreeBSD.org> To: Pedro Giffuni Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 09:40:34 -0700 (PDT) CC: Doug Moore , Cy Schubert , Doug Moore , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Reply-To: rgrimes@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 858B28F08C X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.976,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 16:40:37 -0000 > Hi; > > On 10/05/2019 23:57, Doug Moore wrote: > > With mentor approval, I commit r347469.? I start getting email about > > jenkins failure to build for several architectures on account of the > > _Generic() construct I introduced in that change. > > > > I whip up a patch to undo that part of r347469, and ask for mentor > > approval.? Meanwhile, mentor authorizes me in email to revert r347469. > > > > I try apply applying the fix-patch, and get email that it was rejected > > for lack of reviewer.? In retrospect, it seems to have been committed > > anyway as r347472. > > > > Thinking that things are still broken, I do what my mentor pre-approved > > earlier and revert back to before r347469.? A patch to redo r347469, > > without _Generic(), awaits mentor approval. > > Ugh...? a rather elegant interaction ;) > > > I realize that breaking the build and then committing without mentor > > approval in my first week as committer isn't a good beginning.?? Sorry > > about that. > > It's probably not official policy but I would think you don't need > mentor approval to revert a change, assuming things return to the > pre-commit state, especially if it broke the build. Perhaps this also should be added to the committers guide of explaining what and when you need mentor approval, ie I would consider a revert of a commit that was approved to have mentor (implicit) type status. It should also document that mentors can grant mentee's implicit commit rights, like phk/bde have for all my MFC's, we (I asked, they granted) agreed that if I had approval to commit it to head I did not need to ask them for each merge to be approved. This one should probably be best a per mentor/mentee type agreement. > Pedro. -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org