From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 15 20:11:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF83106572B for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:11:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org) Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F338FC0C for ; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.104.138]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SJVn3-0005Dk-Pm for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:11:18 +0200 Received: from dhcp-077-251-052-224.chello.nl ([77.251.52.224] helo=pinky) by smtp.greenhost.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SJVn3-0006Xu-Km for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:11:17 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <4F6A67C0.7000909@sentex.net> <4F6B3B46.4060105@sentex.net> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 22:11:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: "Ronald Klop" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera Mail/11.62 (Win32) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net X-Spam-Level: / X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20 autolearn=disabled version=3.2.5 X-Scan-Signature: b011d5308189b8f364b008c39e0eea9f Subject: Re: 157k interrupts per second causing 60% CPU load on idle system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 20:11:19 -0000 On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 15:09:34 +0200, Matt Thyer wrote: > On Apr 15, 2012 6:27 PM, "Ronald Klop" > wrote: >> >>> The problem does not occur with 9-STABLE. >>> >>> Who knows what the problem was ? USB maybe ? >> >> >> Do you still have the same hardware on the same interrupts on 9-STABLE? >> Are there changes in the use of MSI(-X)? >> > I made no hardware or BIOS changes and I'm running a GENERIC kernel in > all > testing. That does not mean FreeBSD 9 can't put devices on other interrupts than 8 did. 'dmesg | grep irq' like you did before might show a difference with your previous output. I'm just guessing here for a clue on the result you are seeing, but without any data I cannot answer you (and I guess nobody can). Ronald.