Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 12:40:29 +0900 (JST) From: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> To: jhell@DataIX.net Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Dynamin/Static Resolver Table [netstat like] Message-ID: <20110617.124029.722784011683540958.hrs@allbsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20110617022950.GA58034@DataIX.net> <20110617023358.GB58034@DataIX.net> References: <20110616.015317.781291617533474654.hrs@allbsd.org> <20110617022950.GA58034@DataIX.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jun_17_12_40_29_2011_026)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> wrote in <20110617022950.GA58034@DataIX.net>: jh> Gosh, Wouldnt it be something if we could store our dynamic resolver jh> information with the interface in the same sort of fashion that we store jh> our routing tables ? and then modify our routines in the library to look jh> them up via the "resolving tables" and think of resolv.conf as static jh> routing information only ? jh> jh> If we can already do this via resolvconf(8) in order to modify jh> resolv.conf how hard would it be to adjust to move in this direction ? jhell <jhell@DataIX.net> wrote in <20110617023358.GB58034@DataIX.net>: jh> I appologize for the insta-reply, but thinking more along the lines of jh> this it may come as even more of a benefit to tie this more into the jh> routing table so so each route can have a dynamic nameserver attached to jh> it so when setfib(8) is used a whole nother batch of nameserver could jh> also be used or fall back to the standard resolv.conf. I am not sure of the benefit to adopt "same sort of fashion as the routing table" for RDNSS entries. What is your problem, and how does your idea solve it? -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jun_17_12_40_29_2011_026)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk36zK0ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy1QMQCgu1RPTcK/rJW5gx/3/Oz+IsOJ NVwAoNenH8qh4WA88rGNPJLf0LKkMseW =SJCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Fri_Jun_17_12_40_29_2011_026)----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110617.124029.722784011683540958.hrs>