From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 9 5:42: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate.abacus.co.uk (mailgate.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F6837B401 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 05:41:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from antony@abacus.co.uk) Received: from abacus.co.uk (pcantony.bl.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.111]) by mailgate.abacus.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA32467; Mon, 9 Jul 2001 13:40:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3B49A7FE.2F61FB51@abacus.co.uk> Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 13:47:58 +0100 From: Antony T Curtis Organization: Abacus Polar PLC (UK) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Shterenzon Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: JFS References: <20010709143234.V73818-100000@mail.harmonic.co.il> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Roman Shterenzon wrote: > > Perhaps I wasn't following this thread very closely, but I don't > understand what the discussing about JFS1 and JFS2 is all about. > There's GPL'ed version of JFS for Linux already released to the masses. > I believe porting it is still easier than the OS/2 version. And it's > probably a better FS than the ReiserFS. The Linux (and future AIX) implementation of JFS is based upon the OS/2 version... They cite the OS/2 source as the reference for all of the Linux work. -- ANTONY T CURTIS Tel: +44 (1635) 36222 Abacus Polar Holdings Ltd Fax: +44 (1635) 38670 > I'm going to live forever, or die trying! >  -- Spider Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message