Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2023 12:15:49 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273341] Porter's handbook: a meta port should describe itself as such Message-ID: <bug-273341-9-jTte1eb74p@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-273341-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-273341-9@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273341 --- Comment #3 from Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa <fernape@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Graham Perrin =E2=97=90 from comment #2) It's not that is not perfect. It is looking for the wrong thing. The thing that identifies a metaport as such is USES=3Dmetaport. That is wh= at the handbook says. Metaports *should* use that. The title of this PR says: "a meta port should describe itself as such". I'm arguing that sentence is false. Unless you can provide proof that some authority in the project said that metaports *should* described themselves = as that. What the handbook *does* say is that they should use USE=3Dmetaport. This should give anyone, the list of metaports in the tree: find . -name Makefile -exec egrep -H 'USES=3D.*metaport' {} \; --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-273341-9-jTte1eb74p>