From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 20:32:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B890B106566C for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward2.mail.yandex.net (forward2.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:602::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3124A8FC13 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.mail.yandex.net (smtp2.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.102]) by forward2.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id BCBAD12A3068; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:32:32 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1325104352; bh=WDgz9a1hbFxH1gpmAowMG7+mCyDOENsG1obfRL9A/gQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ksrmfztSkXQ/S9pkNoe163zeVYMaIa+k7emgMjPaiidFhUnWludVh0SwdrQbm0UTc wAejxnCufZ2l+AqldHith5naRouiUA0xCGlHGfxsTRDgRStdf1QeG08g99hD1OHWL7 IZOUaDJbmZgSEVahPvca1a2AbHPIYHQz9goq1lLE= Received: from smtp2.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 97FD8E2034A; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:32:32 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1325104352; bh=WDgz9a1hbFxH1gpmAowMG7+mCyDOENsG1obfRL9A/gQ=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ksrmfztSkXQ/S9pkNoe163zeVYMaIa+k7emgMjPaiidFhUnWludVh0SwdrQbm0UTc wAejxnCufZ2l+AqldHith5naRouiUA0xCGlHGfxsTRDgRStdf1QeG08g99hD1OHWL7 IZOUaDJbmZgSEVahPvca1a2AbHPIYHQz9goq1lLE= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp2.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id WVGivnpi-WWGK7JST; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:32:32 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 22:32:27 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1245989976.20111228223227@yandex.ru> To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201112262154.pBQLsxJt038471@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <9110154891.20111226214424@yandex.ru> <201112262154.pBQLsxJt038471@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[8]: high load system do not take all CPU time X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 20:32:35 -0000 RB> [drivelectomy -- 200+ lines] RB> You've been told the following, *repeatedly*: RB> Your hardware is not capable of keeping up with the level of network traffic RB> it is being subjected to. RB> Reaaltek cards and the 're' device driver are a *BAD*CHOICE* for systems with RB> heavy network traffic. They're merely 'medium lousy' on a lightly-loaded RB> system, but you don't notice the problems under light loads. RB> You have two choices: RB> 1) "live with" the crappy performance RB> 2) get a better quality network card. without only one ipfw fw rule: queue 54 config pipe 54 queue 50 mask dst-ip 0xffffffff gred 0.002/10/30/0.1 275 queue 54 all from any not 80,110 to any in recv re0 works more! better: http://piccy.info/view3/2418620/59aa576c1006bbb046a13554d8468a6c/ with igb cards I get problems too! it put pptp traffice only to one queue0 instead to spread to all: queue0 queue1 queue2 queue3 =`((((( -- С уважением, Коньков mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru