From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Thu Jul 27 13:29:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B65FDCB297 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x232.google.com (mail-lf0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCB22763AB for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mavbsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id d17so12460795lfe.0 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:29:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Ftjzk4r/QnxrutXbyD7XSSfsMrl97q0lx9RG2W/Gh8=; b=BAVpguOkpBV+/b/RxM8c9zdgK3lV9B3zW/cbp2TpZr8fDXHrqZRbnt5+3F4IldcX02 J6Avua//PTXtX3p1fKY8cu6mHpof0mDaA8GtzWAerUeAjI2P195s9is4g1giesfM6gf5 NQZD0V3rBP3clWc6kGia8/6opiZGmwmkBx8PR9neuEQesA3f143SJ+KDIvxwG3bjJQHw FZjkJ+OMmVW6bpPYZxRExG/dC8nl8ujVPV6482SnQZlhv83RXKM+oeybJm/Q05s5h8V9 WTywzt9mDtFaOoKXLdeJbXtJV7zeb4cC9RTLTucNqoFBKhrOBAnOXDJ7uGan4jsBoHJB qvaw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/Ftjzk4r/QnxrutXbyD7XSSfsMrl97q0lx9RG2W/Gh8=; b=cBVyAt0xnsyn1QF3k2s9DcvwowcrdZj63iXNYXljAvHJH5xBzeGIZpPUJfxcg4N1Bl 6reTQ9xLXq2Dn6U6tFXTSem0hMQZ3w13/uptvEX6a57fNSr+mqyev8f71qqRiXHw16kn PlOY+U30+lR0lkxWCdOt3hmNWHJguTU/bTs4eNiapfYTi/JqRQ3xCCS8CBUN/wgd0BRq y2Wj5ywhUA5KWqAhxJx0/HHCNaGfBnwv66V7RIa9j57Rc0OiL7wJZuGeLXPUnefzlk+f 6jrYewj1ZfxZp8h7og2i8MpvKzsu6DHse8BIKGM5fYrZwElkSASWTj6szd68LuDZZO6H vUBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110zUBpFTnJg8mIFa/JNum1+IlJMFYOc+LsJClo/SmCoFjUZxPqy 1+6WK5W+WKrP4yhnjcM= X-Received: by 10.25.211.71 with SMTP id k68mr99008lfg.43.1501162194747; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:29:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spectre.mavhome.dp.ua ([134.249.139.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v126sm63120lfa.21.2017.07.27.06.29.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Alexander Motin Subject: Re: Mega ZFS MFCs To: Mike Tancsa , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List References: <088a85d2-ac64-3b43-eec5-3b21c06eb360@sentex.net> From: Alexander Motin Message-ID: <0a0d4479-2cda-f8ae-965d-ff8bf0e4c3f5@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 16:29:52 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <088a85d2-ac64-3b43-eec5-3b21c06eb360@sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 13:29:57 -0000 Hi Mike, On 27.07.2017 16:21, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I noticed quite a few MFCs to RELENG_11 around zfs yesterday and today. > First off, thank you for all these fixes/enhancements! Of the some 60 > MFCs, are there any particular ones to be more aware of when updating > servers ? The most complicated and invasive to me looks r321610 "8021 ARC buf data scatter-ization". It took 5 fix commits to make it behave in head, but Andriy told me it should be good now, and I run it on my systems too. > Are there any more to come, or is now a good time to test things out ? I've merged all we had in head (except couple gptzfsboot commits significantly increasing its size, that could break POLA). Next round will any way go to head first, so stable/11 should probably be idle for a month at least and should be good for testing now. -- Alexander Motin