Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 22:51:21 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: geom_<name>(4) vs g<name>(8) Message-ID: <91483808.20110921225121@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Freebsd-geom. Why some modules have geom_<name>(4) man page and others have g<name>(8)? Again, is it intentional or historical? Maybe, we need to link all geom_<name>(4) to g<name>(8) and vice versa? It is good to be able to "man <modulename>" and don't "guess" that geom_<name>.ko is documented in g<name>(8). I could provide patches for this -- but maybe I don't understand something and all these differences are intentional? --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?91483808.20110921225121>