From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 8 19:00:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE5D106566B for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jisakiel@yahoo.es) Received: from web28508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web28508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [87.248.110.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2EEE8FC16 for ; Tue, 8 Apr 2008 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jisakiel@yahoo.es) Received: (qmail 33321 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Apr 2008 18:34:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.es; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=beR+bx5Qsq6DGz/LwIQXs683ld387PhmAmitsNZLLW5ZaQ8DWERP59oY+xeSv8Xc1KNSQRW5CRrNen/qLnP8j+vrmf0gKDvXukuPtI9pODPO+RX5/YPA6vCFevfuGwkug02QEdIJbRqm2zK6GdcrR1AarBjfY+UHP7DMyjM/Ma0=; X-YMail-OSG: T.T1d6gVM1mxZtgssmRB.2u7O49O_A8pRGZS8kxyp6YZqsPADBOnwntDE1AvQi68GUiJJ3FSlL7qNMudC.dlBX4Y8XlKIUObs3zviWLOOgdpO2vM.b01zCyEfwc- Received: from [87.223.164.25] by web28508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 08 Apr 2008 18:34:01 GMT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/902.40 YahooMailWebService/0.7.185 Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 18:34:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Jisakiel To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <864348.32703.qm@web28508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ZFS deadlock X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 19:00:44 -0000 =C2=BFSo no chances of ZFS stable on FBSD7? I was actually considering debi= an over freebsd on a dual AMD64, but if there are no settings that will mak= e it stable... Nevertheless I'd be willing to help debugging ZFS on that ma= chine (Dell T105) as soon as I receive it in a couple of weeks, as I'm in n= o rush to getting it into production (just tell me what to do ;) ). =0A=0A= ----- Mensaje original ----=0ADe: Spike Ilacqua =0APara: E= nder =0ACC: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; freebsd-stable@fre= ebsd.org; Johan Str=C3=B6m =0AEnviado: martes, 8 de abri= l, 2008 18:13:32=0AAsunto: Re: ZFS deadlock=0A=0A> Depending on your work = load you are just buying more time, so =0A> "reasonable" is a matter of per= spective. :( I didn't see if you said =0A> you are on 32bit or 64bit? Keep= in mind the kmem max is 1.5-2G on amd64 =0A> regardless of how much memory= you have. If 512M arcsize crashes too soon =0A> for your tastes you can al= ways lower it down to 256M, or 128M, etc.=0A=0AI tried for several weeks to= get ZFS stable on a 64bit system with a =0A1.5G kernel. The best uptime I= ever got was 72 hours, the worst was 2, =0Athe average about 24. Interest= ingly, most of the hangs were at off =0Ahours, when the system was lightly = loaded, had lots of free memory, etc. =0A That suggests to me a slow leak = of some sort.=0A=0AAnyway, ZFS is not ready for production. Some people ma= y get lucky, but =0A you can't count on it.=0A=0ASpike=0A_________________= ______________________________=0Afreebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable=0ATo unsubscribe, = send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A= =0A ______________________________________________ =0A=C2=BFCon Mascot= a por primera vez? S=C3=A9 un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas http:= //es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome