From owner-freebsd-questions  Fri Oct 12 13:43:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DCD7137B405; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 13:43:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rac4.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac4.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.144])
	by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15299;
	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from rac4.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by rac4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA19769;
	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:42:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost)
	by rac4.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19765;
	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: rac4.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 16:42:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu>
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Cc: Henrik Holmstam <turbo@lamering.org>,
	Alfatrion <alfatrion@cybertron.tmfweb.nl>,
	"Maine LOA List Admin (Brent Bailey)" <brentb@loa.com>,
	"Hartmann, O." <ohartman@klima.physik.uni-mainz.de>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IPFW or IPFILTER?
In-Reply-To: <3BC72707.55CF33A7@tenebras.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0110121642070.19241-100000@rac4.wam.umd.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-questions.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-questions>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-questions>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I suppose another big reason that I started using ipfilter is it's
performance... for me and for what we do through our FreeBSD router
(with gaming through the nat) ipfw + natd just wasn't cutting it.

Ken

On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Michael Sierchio wrote:

> Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote:
> > 
> > I don't know, I couldn't get it to do that, which is one of the main
> > reasons I switched to ipfilter :-D
> 
> 01200 divert 8668 ip from any to any via ed0
> 01300 check-state
> 
> ...
> 
> 02000 allow udp from 192.168.1.0/24 to any keep-state
> 
> Easy as pi.
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message