From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 13:30:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1581B106566B for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.224.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB51D8FC19 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q6NDUL5E005770; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 07:30:23 -0600 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 20:32:46 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/10.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <1342992043358-5729028.post@n5.nabble.com> <1343037776471-5729143.post@n5.nabble.com> <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120723064850.59451f74@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201207232032.46496.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Jerry Subject: Re: "da0: 40.000MB/s transfers" What was rationale behind pegging USB 2.0 at 40MB/s? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:30:26 -0000 Hi, On Monday 23 July 2012 17:48:50 Jerry wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 03:02:56 -0700 (PDT) > Jakub Lach articulated: > > > What I previously meant is that I had such pendrive, that > > without former formatting in Windows, didn't even show > > up as device in FreeBSD- was completely useless. > > > > That does not mean I didn't newfs_msdosfsed it after > > that in FreeBSD (worked perfectly fine since) :) > > I experienced that phenomena of a drive not being recognized once also. > However, after formatting it in Windows why duplicate it again in > FreeBSD? It serves no purpose that I am aware of. By the way, it is too > bad that FreeBSD is not able to take advantage of the "exFat" format > like other distributions do. isn't there support for it via fuse? Erich