From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 23:00:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD34A16A4CE for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:00:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EAB43D49 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10CB6122 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 36735-04 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:07 -0600 (CST) Received: from [198.92.228.34] (racerx.makeworld.com [198.92.228.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1C66121 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:07 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <420FDC0C.8060505@makeworld.com> Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:00:28 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050101) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org References: <420FCA6C.7070604@makeworld.com> <1987008862.20050213232914@wanadoo.fr> <420FD5D8.1090101@makeworld.com> <1657848357.20050213234523@wanadoo.fr> <420FD92C.5020706@makeworld.com> <153973809.20050213235838@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <153973809.20050213235838@wanadoo.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: An observation X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:00:10 -0000 Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Chris writes: > > >>As Simon correctly points out - it's being directed to Questions. > > > Not anymore. > > >>IF (and a big one for you to grasp) the Reply had Advocacy (being >>we're now discussing in here) there would not be an issue. > > > If the original description had been clear, I would have fixed it > immediately. I don't know what "this list" refers to because I receive > traffic from both lists, and because the MUA normally routes all replies > automatically to the correct list. > Thank you sir - we're friends once again. -- Best regards, Chris The race is not always to the swift nor the battle to the strong, but that's the way to bet.