From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 28 4: 2: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from wint.itfs.nsk.su (wint.itfs.nsk.su [212.20.32.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF29337B903 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 04:02:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nnd@wint.itfs.nsk.su) Received: (from nnd@localhost) by wint.itfs.nsk.su (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA10549; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:01:41 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from nnd) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:01:41 +0700 (NOVST) Message-Id: <200003281201.TAA10549@wint.itfs.nsk.su> From: Nickolay Dudorov To: Yoshinobu Inoue Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libl.a in libipsec In-Reply-To: <20000328203709M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> User-Agent: tin/1.4.2-20000123 ("Polish") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/5.0-CURRENT (i386)) Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In <20000328203709M.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Yoshinobu Inoue wrote: >> > I am checking it now, but not yet clear why it happens. In >> > old environments, libl.a seemed to be already installed at >> > that time, but now it doesn't exist at libipsec build time. >> >> libl.a isn't necessary for libipsec building at all. >> The error now is the result of adding ${LIBL} to DPADD by bde >> in the ver 1.3 of the Makefile in the src/lib/libipsec. >> >> N.Dudorov > > Thanks, after removing libl related dependency from libipsec > Makefile, buildworld just passed libipsec part. > libl.a was not used on the first place. :-< > > I'll commit the fix. It seems to me (and my buildworld agree with this) that 'liby' is also not necessary for building of 'libipsec'. N.Dudorov To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message