From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 28 22:18:21 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA22133 for current-outgoing; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 22:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA22121 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 22:18:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from julian@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.7.3/8.6.9) id UAA02936; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 20:40:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199604290340.UAA02936@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: About to make the jump to -current... To: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 20:40:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "JULIAN Elischer" Cc: imp@village.org, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199604280717.QAA10735@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> from "Michael Smith" at Apr 28, 96 04:47:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25 ME8b] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk what I do is make a chroot system and build it in there.. then boot off the chroot partition when done.. OR just instal over th e2.1 stuff :) > > Warner Losh stands accused of saying: > > > > I want to build a -current kernel on a -stable system. Is that a > > reasonable thing to do? Will the resulting kernel work with -stable > > binaries? Will I need to build the config out of -current in order to > > configure the kernel, or will the one in -stable be good enough? > > You'll have lots of trouble 8(