From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 01:48:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B315916A41F for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:48:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACD6A43D45 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 01:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: (qmail 22273 invoked from network); 4 Oct 2005 01:48:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130) by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 01:48:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 30924 invoked by uid 89); 4 Oct 2005 01:48:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98) by 0 with SMTP; 4 Oct 2005 01:48:26 -0000 Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB57115F6; Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:48:25 +0300 (EEST) Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 04:48:22 +0300 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Message-ID: <20051004044822.06e66c6a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: <86mzlqiaab.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <43410329.2080902@evildomain.org> <20051003232829.56d753ea@it.buh.tecnik93.com> <86mzlqiaab.fsf@xps.des.no> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.12 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Aaron Holmes , chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam filters X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 01:48:30 -0000 On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 23:02:36 +0200 des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > > Aaron Holmes wrote: > > > Any recomendations on good spam filters? > > Dspam [is] more accurate that spam assassin,with less resources and > > less work for the admin >=20 > Dspam is designed to work as a local delivery agent; all email > addresses must map to a local user, and it delivers mail to an mbox > file (though there are patches to make it work with maildir). For > more complex setups (IMAP server, virtual mailboxes / domains), > SpamAssassin is still the only practical alternative. Actually your information is outdated. It works very nice demonized as a content filter (LMTP/SMTP). --=20 IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"