From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue May 9 9: 8:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C122437B710 for ; Tue, 9 May 2000 09:08:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA20459; Tue, 9 May 2000 18:08:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netfinity 5600 patches References: <81904.957887029@verdi.nethelp.no> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 09 May 2000 18:08:13 +0200 In-Reply-To: sthaug@nethelp.no's message of "Tue, 09 May 2000 17:43:49 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG sthaug@nethelp.no writes: > As far as I can see, these patches aren't needed for 4.0-STABLE. I > have a 4.0-STABLE system here with no kernel patches, and it seems > to be working fine. Note that there is already support for the RCC > chipsets in /sys/i386/isa/pcibus.c. See attached boot messages. You're right - I never got around to testing a recent 4.0 on the 5600. I've tried running 3.4-RELEASE as well as whichever version of 4.0 is on the latest snapshot CD. > For 3.x, isn't Andrew Gallatin's patch more general? See > http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=60828+0+archive/2000/freebsd-smp/20000423.freebsd-smp Looks like it - and Andrew's the one who added support for the RCC in the first place. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message