From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 1 06:46:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA29872 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:46:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA29858 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 06:46:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA092739310; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 03:55:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 03:55:10 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/9835: Port update: squeak2 In-Reply-To: <199901312330.PAA78486@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Roland Jesse wrote: > No, not for this specific update. But we did have some discussion about > the squeak port some time ago (when 2.2 was current). The initial port > (now: lang/squeak1) was done by me. I did not have the time to do any > squeak2 porting (as I was studying at another university for a year > without access to a FreeBSD machine), so he did it. Now, I just updated > the port as I am was compiling 2.3 anyway. Okay. I haven't looked at the guts of it yet, I was just commenting on what I saw initially. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message