From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 23 12:47:32 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFFF16A4B3
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from perrin.nxad.com (internal.nxad.com [69.1.70.251])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2281343FAF
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:47:31 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from hmp@nxad.com)
Received: by perrin.nxad.com (Postfix, from userid 1072)
	id 9C0AE20F01; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 12:47:30 -0700
From: Hiten Pandya <hmp@nxad.com>
To: Eli Dart <dart@nersc.gov>
Message-ID: <20031023194730.GA55808@perrin.nxad.com>
References: <20031021140013.47D17C6C538@guns.icir.org>
	<20031021184601.98733F8EB@gemini.nersc.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <20031021184601.98733F8EB@gemini.nersc.gov>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: SACK?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 19:47:32 -0000

On Tue, Oct 21, 2003 at 11:46:01AM -0700, Eli Dart wrote:
:=20
: In reply to Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> :
:=20
: > =20
: > Hi folks!
: >=20
: > Are there any plans to incorporate SACK in FreeBSD?  It'd sure be
: > handy for me to have (I prefer the *BSDs, and, alas, they are the
: > only remaining SACK-less systems worth mentioning).  I think there
: > are research implementations that could be used as a basis (Luigi
: > Rizzo did one, I think.).  Any thoughts in this area?
:=20
: In fact, OpenBSD has SACK -- this narrows the Field of the SACK-less=20
: to FreeBSD and NetBSD.....

	Only FreeBSD, because NetBSD has a sack implementation.

	Regards,

--=20
Hiten Pandya
hmp@FreeBSD.ORG