From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 15:44:50 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0760B16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:44:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F19343D54 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:44:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4581DD5A7; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 65020-01-92; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A133F1DD59D; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29531C00715; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:34 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Matthias Muthmann Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:44:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502240244.03104.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200503022010.39072.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1109950493.21431.5.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503041644.34459.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with X.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:44:50 -0000 On Friday 04 of March 2005 16:34, Matthias Muthmann wrote: > On Mi, 2005-03-02 at 20:10 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > Just the ones that don't work (if they are consecutive in the row, only a > > range would be fine). I'm also interested in whether without these > > patches applied - was the row in question behaving the same as the other > > keys (ie codes generated being off by one) or was it behaving differently > > even then? > > > > > > Dejan > > Ok, now I tried X without your patches. The lowest row behaves in the > same way as with your patches: > e.g. keycode 198 (keysym 0x0, NoSymbol) > But the keycodes are shifted by one (Y is 191, not 190 ...) Thank you! I'll try digging into this over weekend and hopefully find something that can be done to map codes properly :) Dejan