Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 22 Aug 2014 17:29:27 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 192878] comms/pr [maintainer] new source location
Message-ID:  <bug-192878-13-unrhTGR5ob@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192878-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-192878-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192878

--- Comment #22 from C Hutchinson <portmaster@bsdforge.com> ---
(In reply to John Marino from comment #21)
> You don't understand how DOCS and PORTDOCS works.
> 
> They should be enabled.
> It should install unconditionally.
> The staging mechanism will decide based on the state of the OPTION DOCS
> where or not to put it into the pkg-plist.
> 
> This is why all references to %%PORTDOCS%% has to be removed from the
> pkg-plist too when it's used this way.
> 
> It's the user that gets to decide if he wants docs.
> You've already basically got this 90% implemented, just finish it off.  Read
> the second on in the porters handbook on PORTDOCS for more information.

Understood.
I left it commented for later use, should I have more than one
doc. So that I might make it optional. I guess I could just
uncomment it. Given it'll still install it, anyway.

Is that what you need?

--Chris

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192878-13-unrhTGR5ob>