From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 14 11:38:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mango.attlabs.att.com (gatemp.ipo.att.com [135.197.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7231C37B6B2 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:38:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by mango.attlabs.att.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA27604 for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:38:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner) Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:38:43 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <200003141938.LAA27604@mango.attlabs.att.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Ports installing files in /usr/X11R6/share/aclocal/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I think aclocal is only likely to find files in /usr/local/share/aclocal/. The following ports install files in /usr/X11R6/share/aclocal/. graphics/gdk-pixbuf graphics/gimp1 graphics/imlib x11/dgs x11/gnomelibs x11-toolkits/gtk-- x11-toolkits/gtk12 x11-toolkits/vdk x11-toolkits/vdkbuilder Either: - the automake port should be modified to make aclocal look in /usr/local/share/aclocal and /usr/X11R6/share/aclocal, or - these 9 ports should be modified to put the aclocal files in /usr/local/share/aclocal. Any opinions? I haven't looked into either possibility. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message