Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:02:55 -0400
From: Philip Paeps <philip@freebsd.org>
To: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws>
Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, Antoine Brodin <antoine@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD ARM List <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ampere2's main-armv7 crashed after only 3 min 51 sec, nothing started to build; libdm.so.{6->7} issues
Message-ID: <349F2B57-1045-4375-BC88-56B0D6194006@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <1902543396.49319.1729630346915@localhost>
References: <1902543396.49319.1729630346915@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2024-10-22 16:52:26 (-0400), Ronald Klop wrote: > Ampere2 is building armv7 again > https://pkg-status.freebsd.org/ampere2/build.html?mastername=3Dmain-arm= v7-default&build=3Dp94c4ac6b071b_sc87b3f0006 > BTW: I made a graph that shows how old a pkg repo is per = > architecture.It shows that arm/aarch64 is significantly older than = > i386/amd64. But also that armv7 is way behind the rest now. It takes aarch64 considerably longer to build a set than i386/amd64. = The builds are scheduled at the same frequency, but we don't start a new = build while another build is still going. Our aarch64 builders spend most of their time building about 19 = different versions of LLVM (at last count). This really slows down the = pipeline. Philip
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?349F2B57-1045-4375-BC88-56B0D6194006>