From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Wed Mar 14 23:38:21 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F99F524B8 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:38:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Received: from mail.bsd4all.net (mail.bsd4all.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:217b::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.bsd4all.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4C97DAC2 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@gojira.at) Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:38:11 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: option TCP_RFC7413 is not in GENERIC Message-ID: <20180314233811.GA35025@mail.bsd4all.net> References: <1521062028.2511351.1303413736.6960BF4F@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1521062028.2511351.1303413736.6960BF4F@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 23:38:21 -0000 On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 04:13:48PM -0500, Mark Felder wrote: > Hello all, > > Has there been a discussion about enabling this in GENERIC? Is there a performance impact even if the sysctl knob is disabled? What can we do to get a wider audience of testers? I would gladly test this for apps that support it but the hurdle of requiring a custom kernel to test this is more effort than its worth... https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=330002 -- Herbert