From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 21 03:13:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8618C16A4CE; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:13:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (c211-30-75-229.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.75.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46743FDD; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 03:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peterjeremy@optushome.com.au) Received: from server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (localhost.vk2pj.dyndns.org [127.0.0.1])hALBDDJD071602; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:13:13 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.vk2pj.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id hALBDDMo071601; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:13:13 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 22:13:13 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20031121111313.GA71265@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <20031119003133.18473.qmail@web11404.mail.yahoo.com> <200311201327.29226.wes@softweyr.com> <20031121095939.GS511@garage.freebsd.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031121095939.GS511@garage.freebsd.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: phk@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "secure" file flag? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 11:13:16 -0000 On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:59:40AM +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: >Such "secure" flag for running process could be also implemented with >multiple meanings: Is the "secure" flag intended to protect the process image from the invoking user as well as other users? >1. All freed pages have to be zeroed. >2. All removed files have to be overwritten. >3. Umask for newly created files should be 0077. >4. "secure" flag for newly created files should be forced? >5. ... 5. Modified pages can't be written to swap (unless swap is encrypted). 6. Process get setuid-type treatment of core-dumps and rtld environment etc ... Peter