From owner-freebsd-current Wed Oct 1 16:52:44 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA17178 for current-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA17170 for ; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id QAA18525; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 16:52:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Brandon Gillespie cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new command: doconfig In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Oct 1997 16:21:45 MDT." Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 16:52:40 -0700 Message-ID: <18521.875749960@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The only reason I didn't do it, was because I've never been able to find > out if anybody is working on this already... If not, then perhaps we can > make one. I have a few ideas on various modular ways this could be > implemented. I don't think that anyone is really working on it - they keep waiting for a miracle to happen and config(1) to simply go away. ;-) Since that's not likely anytime soon, I say go for it with doconfig. > So I guess the question is, what is there right now for auto generating a > kernel config file? Nothing. :( Jordan