From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 21 09:50:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AC91065672 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1C08FC0C for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3L9oD1c015558 for ; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q3L9oDUj015557; Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 GMT Message-Id: <201204210950.q3L9oDUj015557@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Michael Scheidell Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166722: graphics/ufraw: port fails to build if " GTK" option is disabled and x11-toolkits/gtkimageview port is not installed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michael Scheidell List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 09:50:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/166722; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Michael Scheidell To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/166722: graphics/ufraw: port fails to build if "GTK" option is disabled and x11-toolkits/gtkimageview port is not installed Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2012 05:43:07 -0400 Thank you for your submission and problem report. We appreciate your support of the FreeBSD ports system. gtkimageview port is currently without an official maintainer, and could use someone to help keep it up to date. Duties, would pretty much be just submit pr's and patches, like you did above, but with a maintainer, these patches would get committer faster. If someone else sends in a pr, you would get an email, check the patch, and either reply back to approve it, or suggest a better patch. Do you have any interest in being the official maintainer for this port? -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell