Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 16:38:43 +0400 From: Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com> To: "Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fw: zpool-zfs'es on a GELI-encrypted volume are not mounted at boot [patch included] Message-ID: <86mxgmjooc.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20110710142617.1d80289b@dijkstra> (Christopher J. Ruwe's message of "Sun, 10 Jul 2011 14:26:17 %2B0200") References: <20110710142617.1d80289b@dijkstra>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Christopher J. Ruwe" <cjr@cruwe.de> writes: > Nearly a week ago I posted this question to freebsd-fs, but probalby my > question is a) worded too complicatedly, b) not really a > filesystem-issue or c) both. > > To rephrase: In setups requiring one or more ZFS-dataset to be mounted > before another service is activated (GELI in my case) and the rest of > the ZFS-datasets after that service is activated (because they require > GELI), it seems to be necessary to add a `zfs mount -a` to > mountcritlocal. Is this considered correct behaviour and wouldn't it > make sense to add such a line to mountcritlocal in the standard setup? [...] Have you tried to set zfs_enable=YES in rc.conf? Based on rcorder(8) output rc.d/zfs should come just after rc.d/mountcritlocal.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86mxgmjooc.fsf>