Date: Sat, 6 Jul 1996 02:34:58 +0400 (MSD) From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/lynx/files md5 Message-ID: <199607052234.CAA00373@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199607051759.KAA01818@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at "Jul 5, 96 10:59:40 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> * The reason is simple: since lynx changed almost everyday, > * checksum always mismatch. > > That's not a valid reason to not have a checksum. We put up the > latest port and matching distfile on ftp.freebsd.org, without the > checksum it is not possible for the user to determine if the distfile > is correct or not. Does it mean that I can NOT update checksum on each checksum mismatch request from users? -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607052234.CAA00373>