From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 26 09:51:33 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CB41065675;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:51:33 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ftp51246-2575596@sh4-5.1blu.de)
Received: from sh4-5.1blu.de (sh4-5.1blu.de [213.83.63.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702CE8FC08;
	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:51:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ftp51246-2575596 by sh4-5.1blu.de with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1QEevZ-0005qW-VN; Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:51:30 +0200
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:51:29 +0200
From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Message-ID: <20110426095128.GA14455@sh4-5.1blu.de>
References: <20110426080424.GA12864@sh4-5.1blu.de>
	<1303809741.6417.75.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <1303809741.6417.75.camel@macbook.infradead.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE (i386)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 9.0-CURRENT r220692 && cc1: internal compiler error:
	Segmentation fault: 11
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:51:33 -0000

El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 10:22:21AM +0100, David Woodhouse escribió:

> >   crash, i.e. it is *not* the typical hardware related crash;
> > - the above mentioned version evolution-exchange-2.32.1_1 is a fake, in
> >   real it is compiling the original evolution-exchange-2.32.3 sources;
> > - it is fully reproduceable
> > 
> > What next?
> > (David, should it be posted to evolution@gnome.org as well?)
> 
> Looks like a compiler bug, so probably not. 
> 
> What version of GCC? You probably want to file a PR at gcc.gnu.org.
> 
> ....
> 
> Then you can go to gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla and file a PR.

Thanks for your hints concerning the GCC problem; I will collect the
data and file a bug report;

> In the meantime, however, if you don't need evolution-exchange then you
> can just ignore this problem and get on with the other things you were
> trying to test?

I need the evolution-exchange connector; can I live with 2.32.1 while
evolution and its dataserver are 2.32.3? If not, I must go back fully to
2.32.1 after the debugging of the calendar stuff;

	matthias

-- 
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <guru@unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/